Islamic Insights | Inspired by the Holy Quran and AhlulBayt | Publication of The Awaited One Foundation

AhlulBayt Academy

Thu05172012

Last update11:22:56 AM GMT

Back Insights Features Technology Facebook: Bulldozing the Social Landscape?

Facebook: Bulldozing the Social Landscape?

  • PDF

Does Facebook flatten out reality?Facebook isn't meant to replace real life or actual social interaction, and I don't think many people think of it as an alternative. Everyone realizes it's an addition, a plus, something to support everyday interactions. And I'm not even going to get into the "is it even Halal, is it a bad influence?" situation right now.

Social interaction is so delicate in real life. We have a hundred different selves in real life, different levels of professionalism and formality, different attitudes on things depending on the kind of crowd we are with. Cultures have intricate rules of etiquette and social norms that control situations and interactions with people before we even begin talking. They say body language is more than 50 percent of what we communicate to someone else.

I know when my mother says it's ok if I don't clean the kitchen, it really means I better clean the kitchen or I'm going to feel guilty the rest of the day. I can see in my friend's eyes that she is not ok when she smiles and tells me she is doing fine. I talk quietly around those I don't know well, but I'm loud and talkative around those I am close with. I know what jokes are appropriate for which situations, though I am usually socially awkward.

These intricacies are hard to translate online. Real life is a varied landscape, with mountains and valleys, crescendos and cliffs, as well as deep caves, wide trees, and open plains of meaning. It is so rich and textured and different for everyone who experiences it.

I feel like Facebook flattens out reality. As I said, obviously it's not meant to replace real social interaction – but it kind of distorts truth and one's way of thinking of the world. People you never talk to and those you are super close to show up equally on your NewsFeed. Everyone's words sound neutral and monotone, without that landscape of emotion and range that it would have if said in person. Every mountain and valley of differing social experiences, social circles, perceptions, and biases one has for others is flattened out on the Internet. We find ourselves dealing more with certain people online than we ever do in real life. We find ourselves joking around with someone online who at school we sort of barely make awkward small talk with. Each "emotional" or "deep" status message seems empty and repetitive when blasted online for the world despite how much meaning it would have if whispered to you by your friend during a late night talk. We skim through people's successes and "FML"s, their engaged/married statuses, and their copy-pasted quotes like we skim through YouTube videos and Google News. I think that makes it easier to judge rather than to empathize.

The connotations of an action, the body language of the speaker, the implied meaning on top of the obvious meaning – all need to be deciphered by our personal perceptions during those few seconds rather than the social cues of the landscape of life. Maybe it's just me, but the pleas for pity, the super deep quote from someone I have a suspicion doesn't really understand what it means, and the attempts at being witty come across as hollow and insincere. And we can't forget that therapeutic relief quality of anonymously-directed-venting via social media. Do "I hate when people can't just keep their mouths shut", "Feeling betrayed by certain people, just can't trust anyone", "If you want to apologize, calling 20 times isn't the way to do it" sound like familiar statuses? Sometimes it's easier to pretend to talk generally and release our feelings via Twitter or FB statuses rather than talk to the target of our anger or unhappy thoughts directly. Hey, I'm not pointing fingers or judging – I do all these things too. My point isn't that people are fake; it's that whatever we're saying comes across indelicately. Sort of like walking up to someone we don't know well and letting them casually know that our family member just died. That's enough to make everyone around wince just a little bit.

I find myself feeling uncomfortable when I see someone's status with TMI, as in I really didn't need to know all that. Like that awkward inside joke that only one other person understands, or detailed information on how last night was, or jokes that make people uncomfortable. I really don't want to know about how much you hate your mother through your status, little preteen girl that I know through the Islamic center. Unless we are sitting there having a heart-to-heart about difficult family situations, you should probable keep that to a private message. You do realize you have people besides your best friends on Facebook, right? In fact, I think you have a Maulana added as a friend. (You realize if he has a Facebook, then he probably knows enough about it to check it as well. Your immature post just blasted across Maulana's NewsFeed. Awkkk-ward.)

Even Wall posts on a friend's page are treated like actual private conversations. So that "certain someone" who we don't talk to but are talking about on our Wall-to-Wall can actually see our conversation. Weird, huh? That delicacy of the social interaction feels bulldozed when I see a post about their personal life on Facebook or Twitter when maybe I did a group project with them in a class once, or used to work with them two jobs ago and then added them on Facebook. They wouldn't blurt it out in front of me if we were standing in a circle of people at school, but on Facebook people seem to overlook their other 400 friends.

Speaking of that, as an aside, really do you need that many friends? I never understood the need to add every people one ever meets on Facebook and then keep them as friends for a long time. I work with someone, add them, and then unless I'm good friends with them, if I change a job, I delete them. Because I really don't think they are going to care about my Ramadan statuses and personal rants, or my plea to show up at a protest downtown the next day. Personally, I try to keep to 200 friends who I regularly interact with, and even then I definitely feel like I'm overreaching.

I sometimes wonder if our interactions with people in real life have changed since social media became big. I know email and texting were already starting to shift our social and professional lives significantly, but social media connected us to a community larger than ourselves. A different social experience was born. Perhaps some would even argue a superior system. After all, where else can you interact with your best friend, your lab partner, your handy computer nerd acquaintance, and your cousin from Lebanon all in one arena? That's got to be worth something right? Or is it in fact making these relationships less meaningful, more perfunctory, and evenly distributed in ways that it would never be in a face-to-face situation?

Author of this article: Zainab Haider
Interesting Reading

Comments  

 
+5 # otowi 2011-09-21 08:23
The other day my niece and her friend spent the night at my house. They sat there watching a movie and using their smart phones to post stuff and 'chat' on FB. I don't think they really caught the whole movie, and it was pretty strange watching them spending the night together but interacting more with friends on FB than with each other half the time. But they thought it was normal.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # Nour 2011-09-21 12:30
Beautifully written! And so very true!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # R.J. 2011-09-21 13:30
Psychologists say that a typical human being can barely have a personal network of 150 friends.

npr.org/.../...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-11 # ekon 2011-09-21 18:20
This piece could have been so much more better and apt. Talking about the relationship between fb and the "social landscape".

Instead, it's one big complaint form like an unsatisfied customer emotionally judging everyone involved in such typical style. Oh and adding, "i'm not judging, I do all these things too" yes, thank you for trying to give this article (or yourself) some value.
If you wanted to let of some steam about what you despise - great. Writing & publishing and posting an piece that judges all those people (yes it is judging before you think otherwise, check a dictionary) just makes you guilty of the very thing you condemned.

"Because I really don't think they are going to care about my Ramadan statuses and personal rants, or my plea to show up at a protest downtown the next day." awful.

"rather than talk to the target of our anger or unhappy thoughts directly" So I suppose that you've spoken directly to all these people of course, but then decided to target your anger an unhappy thoughts here too? makes sense.

"They wouldn't blurt it out in front of me if we were standing in a circle of people" Would like to know what reaction you got when you blurted all this out to the people you're referring to (assuming you're not a hypocrite).

Oh but let's not forget the classic once again "I do all these things too". wow. so like what's the purpose of this piece then?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+9 # Re: ekon 2011-09-21 19:54
Picking and choosing sentences out of context from the article has no meaning and only does injustice to the message given here. If you think the writer is "judgmental" as you claim, there was a better way to put it than blatant and twisted criticism (that certainly lacks akhlaq). The overall message of the article is simple: facebook (or even other online media communication) does not replace real-life communication and several times brings forward different reactions and behaviors in people that is not expected of them in real-life.

Another article about online communication from the point of view of psychologists was posted on this site earlier: islamicinsights.com/.../...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-11 # ekon 2011-09-21 20:47
To avoid replying to any of my points by hiding behind "picking out of context" is simply shameful. It is quite obvious where the author is making immature and offensive remarks which inevitably question if she is doing exactly the samething - except to those who don't want to see it.

you mentioned "message given here" and stated the message is 1. fb doesn't replace real-life communications. Perhaps 20% of the article deals with this. 2. it brings forward reactions that arent expected in real life - this is most of the article and is mentioned with nothing but cheap shots and unnecessary criticisms. This majority part of the article certainly lacks akhlaq if you would like to bring this into the frame work. And just to show there was plenty more I decided not to show:
"the super deep quote from someone I have a suspicion doesn't really understand what it means" im not sure if it would be right to think the author was arrogant, but they are definitely not humble. And once again this is unnecessary, useless judgement. Nothing more. Am happy to quote more if you like?

This piece would suit newspaper corner sections of people letting off their opinions, not an Islamic websites which tries to give necessary and helpful works.

This article is judgemental from top to bottom - otherwise please define what judgemental is and how it differentiates from this?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+7 # aliwala 2011-09-21 19:22
Honest question to put up...But

what is the solution for such bulldozing of landscaping....delete the fb account or use it less???

The author must have come up with solutions as well...otherwise what good is posing questions...most of the people are aware of these things...

the article is nice and reflecting....but wud have been better if u add one conclusion of solution too....next time keep in mind plzz.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5 # Readergirl 2011-09-22 12:36
The article is meant to be an opinion piece, not informative. In that context, it seeks to express what many people might feel: that interactions on facebook can feel hollow and drain the depth of a real conversation.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Oh 2011-09-22 19:29
This is totally an opinion piece. I don't see the problem in it being judgmental anyways...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # Hussain Ali 2011-09-24 14:47
In some parts of the world, facebook is used to help overthrow governments, create rallies, and get your word out.

In others, facebook is used to complain about facebook. Replace facebook, with internet or TV or radio or the next generation of technology or communication platform.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # Yusuf 2011-09-24 16:21
Thanks to the sister for writing this article, jazakallah. Some of the criticisms of it here are clearly born out of some sort of ill will, though the absence of body language makes this less easy to detect :)

I would like to offer one solution to this problem. It is possible to tailor Facebook to accomplish the tasks that you want to use it for. For example, if you want to use it to keep up with close friends and family, then set it up with that in mind and avoid using it to expand your social world. On the other hand, if you like being exposed to hundreds of strangers' then don't use facebook for.the more intimate interactions. I personally use Facebook mostly for news and religious issues, so I keep those people in my newsfeed who post on these topics and hide those who post personal things. As soon as I see a tmi post, I hide that person. When I go on Facebook I hardly ever see any embarrasing things because I've hidden the people who embarrass themselves.

And yes @ekon--this does involve judging people.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # ekon 2011-09-26 22:50
Thanks for your incredibly naive comment.
If you read my first comment i made it very clear what I was criticizing: it was not "judgement". Judgement is obviously done and should be done by everyone to certain extent. it was the fact this author judged so many people for the very thing she was doing in this judgemental piece, AND then claimed "im not judging".
The other users responded by denying there was any judgement in the first place! Until now some few people are admitting it was a judgemental piece as expected. took a long time for at least a few to accept that first fact (if the author has accepted it is another issue). now they can move on to the actual point.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # Xavier 2011-09-27 20:40
Many years ago, a reporter on PBS's NewsHour recorded a televised piece in which he lamented about the same thing concerning people's cellular phone conversations that they had in public without concern as to who was listening. He described about being on an elevator when a woman began talking on her phone about her abortion. The piece wasn't filled with indignation, but with a sadness that drew the viewer into the scope of the current era where self editing, self control and secrecy as to one's inner emotions and life has been supplanted by a conscious or sub-consciousness need to tell the world about our problems. In other words: News 24/7 about ME!

In this world of virtual life, we seem to have adopted the need to become a news piece and as the reporter who covers ourselves, thereby laying ourselves open for display.

As Muslims, we have failed to see that by divulging some secrets of the heart, we have failed at seeking consolation with the Creator. We have used social status, chat staus, etc., as our call to the outside world and while asking for help in some ways is good in dire situations for mutual support, we are forgetting that or ultimate return is to Him. This return is more than when we die, but in every part of our life. He wants us to turn to Him and that's the tragedy of the situation. Instead, people addicted to the online life have exposed themselves here where strangers are one click away from forgetting you.

In essence, with social media, we have turned away from Allah (swt). And when questioned in the grave, I cringe to think someone may answer "facebook" to the question, "Who is your God? Who did you turn to for help?" Is that extreme to think so? Think that the people of Ignorance turned to stones to complain and worship to. Our idols are merely electronic.


With duas,
--Xavier
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

Islamic Insights does not necessarily endorse any comments published by our web users unless otherwise noted. Posting links to other websites will be allowed as long as it pertains to the discussion. Spamming the comments page with articles and other links may get you banned. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge our right, at our sole discretion, to change, modify, add, or delete your comments and portions of these Terms of Use at any time without further notice.

Security code
Refresh